Archive

Monthly Archives: August 2012

We all know that the drug trade is unethical but I am talking about the LEGAL drug trade.

The pharmaceutical companies are trying to brainwash us. They are pharmacists, so they are aware that the media is a powerful mind changing drug.

Basically there are two types of drug that they advertise in the media:

First there is the prescription drugs. Why are they advertising these in the media?

Doctors spend a lot of years studying to be able to prescribe to us, what is needed for us to feel better. Why is it that the pharmaceutical companies think that we will know better what is good for us. In their advertisements they tell us that we should ask our doctor for this or that medicine, why?

Do they think because they are pharmacists, they know what is ailing us with out seeing us, than a doctor can after a check up? Advertising costs a lot of money and so do medicines, so why don’t the companies try to reduce the price of the medications by cutting out the advertising? Surely it must be a lot cheaper, just to keep the doctors informed of any new medications there are?

The second kind of drug that is advertised in the media are the “over the counter” ones, those that do not need a doctor’s prescription to buy. These drugs may be for a mild headache or back pain. They are though, required by law, to state in the advertisement any side effects that may be associated with these drugs. They do this in the most indiscreet way, making it sound like it is unimportant, yet usually goes something like this “May be accompanied by severe depression, violent nausea or suicidal tendencies, if you experience any of these, please see a doctor”. Excuse me, if I have committed suicide, the only doctor I will get to see is the mortician. If I get violent nausea or severe depression, I think I may have been better off with the mild headache or back pain.

Why, when the drugs are already prohibitively expensive, are the companies allowed to go on paying for expensive advertisements?

The latest campaign, includes giving out free samples of a sex enhancing drug. Who is going to pay for these free samples? Is it the little boy or girl, who are suffering painfully each day because their parents cannot afford the pain relieving drugs, no. Is it the executives that work at the advertising agencies or media houses, no. It is us. If drugs can be afforded to be given out free, then surely it should be the medical ones that can help children, not the cosmetic ones that help an adults ego.

I am not a fool, I know that advertisements help sales but these are drugs. The two ways these items should have increases in sales is either more people get sick or the prices drop. The pharmaceutical companies already know this though, that is why they inundate us with these advertisements, they know the hypnotic effect of them and they want to turn us all in to hypochondriacs. 

Here is my recommendation: The pharmaceutical companies develop a drug to that cures greed, then give them out free, to their executives and share holders.

If you were to tell a child in some of the Third World countries, that you have enough clean water that you even s**t in it, they would look at you in disbelief. Thousands of children die weekly because they do not have access to clean water, WHY?

I know, you are going to say transport is the problem: Why?

How come we have the technology to ensure several Astronauts, in the Space Station, have unlimited water for an unlimited time, yet do not have the technology to allow a child on Earth to die through lack of it?

OK, you are going to say: expense, the World is in debt.

In debt to who?

Money is only paper. It is not backed by any kind of assurance, it is only printed in order to receive interest. Bankers are trying (and succeeding) to produce wealth from nothing.

Real wealth is oil or Gold.

Now where does most of the Gold come from?

Oh yes, it comes from the same countries that the children dying of thirst come from. Isn’t it funny how there always seems to be enough water to clean off a speck of Gold, yet not enough to give a child a drop to save it’s life?

In these times when technology has advanced so far that, they say, we can look back in time through telescopes, to the origin of the Universe, that they can so easily forget the last century?

In the 20th Century, we were so proud to say that we have found the cure for Malaria, TB and other diseases, these advances should save mankind.

Why then, today, are millions of children dying of these things annually?

Is it a lack of transport? No.

Is it a lack of money? No.

It is a lack of resolve, of  the people and the Politicians.

Now, I can understand the politicians: The children are not old enough to vote, they are sick and probably won’t reach the age to vote, but what about US?

We can drink, we can eat, we can live and we can vote. Yet WE allow this situation to continue. Why?

Speak up, or forever hold your head in shame above the grave (that does not exist) for the unknown child.